In a significant shift, the appellate court ruled that a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court means that convicted felons can't automatically be deprived of their right to bear arms.
Edvard Pettersson is a Los Angeles-based reporter for Courthouse News, covering federal and state courts, civil and criminal cases. Born in Amsterdam, Edvard has covered Southern California news for the Los Angeles Business Journal and Bloomberg News.
Follow @edpettersson
In a significant shift, the appellate court ruled that a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court means that convicted felons can't automatically be deprived of their right to bear arms.
A federal judge concluded that a group of children had no standing to bring their lawsuit over pollution and the climate crisis.
A federal judge threw out the media company's lawsuit, finding a California state court should decide if the subpoenas can be enforced.
In a significant shift, the appellate court ruled that a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court means that convicted felons can't automatically be deprived of their right to bear arms.
In a significant shift, the appellate court ruled that a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court means that convicted felons can't automatically be deprived of their right to bear arms.
In a significant shift, the appellate court ruled that a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court means that convicted felons can't automatically be deprived of their right to bear arms.
In a significant shift, the appellate court ruled that a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court means that convicted felons can't automatically be deprived of their right to bear arms.
In a significant shift, the appellate court ruled that a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court means that convicted felons can't automatically be deprived of their right to bear arms.