The appeals court panel ordered a federal judge to review the statutory scheme one requirement at a time to determine if any portion violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
Kevin Koeninger is a reporter based in the Cincinnati area who covers numerous county, state, and federal courts in Ohio and Kentucky, as well as the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. He has worked for CNS for over ten years, and provides coverage of initial complaints, judicial rulings, appellate decisions, and oral arguments.
Follow @@kkoeninger44
The appeals court panel ordered a federal judge to review the statutory scheme one requirement at a time to determine if any portion violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
A class of consumers says deceptive marketing duped them into buying Duramax diesel trucks, which emitted higher amounts of pollutants than their gas-burning counterparts.
The Bluegrass State accused the EPA of "bait-and-switch" tactics and argued its ozone regulation plan complied with all federal requirements under the Clean Air Act.
The appeals court panel ordered a federal judge to review the statutory scheme one requirement at a time to determine if any portion violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
The appeals court panel ordered a federal judge to review the statutory scheme one requirement at a time to determine if any portion violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
The appeals court panel ordered a federal judge to review the statutory scheme one requirement at a time to determine if any portion violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
The appeals court panel ordered a federal judge to review the statutory scheme one requirement at a time to determine if any portion violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
The appeals court panel ordered a federal judge to review the statutory scheme one requirement at a time to determine if any portion violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.