Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

View Back issues

Oregon Court Of Appeals

FAMILY LAW, ATTORNEY FEES – The state appeals court held that a diamond ring should not have treated as marital property because the wife acquired it before the marriage, the parties did not testify that they understood the ring to be joint property, and the wife wore the ring after it was remounted and resized to fit her finger. Further, the husband should not have been awarded fees because he failed to give his wife the requisite notice. Affirmed in part. See ruling.

Categories / Uncategorized

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

Loading...